How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Norman, OK

131,010 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 4052500 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Norman ranked #81 of 340 cities and 3rd of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Norman and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Charleston SC, Fayetteville AR, Killeen TX, Murfreesboro TN, Kansas City KS, Columbia SC, Lancaster CA, Victorville CA, High Point NC, Davenport IA, Denton TX, Jurupa Valley CA, North Charleston SC · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#81 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023#35#58#139#20#109#48#57#28#98#67#110#48#122#89#70#178#64#94#81#50
people · size, not ranked102,615105,552106,533108,216109,720111,402113,882115,600118,695118,228120,239121,974123,390123,844124,880128,179129,099129,779130,349131,010
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#98 of 340 cities · 9th of 14 in its peer group+0.9+2.1+0.7+1.2+0.9—+1.2+0.8+0.7-0.7+0.8+0.9+0.1+0.2+0.7+0.2+0.5+0.3+0.2+0.1
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#126 of 271 cities with data · 8th of 11 in its peer group with data10.77.54.65.44.67.03.411.66.09.85.311.43.23.33.66.25.73.33.23.3
rent as % of income · lower is better#15 of 340 cities · 1st of 14 in its peer group18.5%20.3%17.1%17.5%18.8%20.4%18.0%18.6%18.5%17.6%18.8%18.2%19.5%17.8%18.4%—18.5%20.1%20.2%17.8%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#14 of 304 cities with data · 1st of 13 in its peer group with data—4.73.81.8—1.81.80.93.42.5—0.85.72.43.23.91.51.51.50.8
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#74 of 295 cities with data · 1st of 11 in its peer group with data———————————30.325.121.018.439.037.233.136.124.4
jobs · size, not ranked39,74141,21840,85544,14942,99843,63543,47344,33044,16645,36744,91745,08144,76745,57145,95743,35543,82147,24849,033—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#160 of 329 cities with data · 8th of 14 in its peer group · 2023+3.6+2.6-2.1+5.9-0.4+0.6-2.9-1.2-2.4+1.6-3.2+1.3-0.4-0.9-0.1-3.1+1.7+2.8-0.1—
people · size, not ranked——————58,22157,85554,69561,30261,79860,83863,20163,38361,843—65,67266,31567,58466,417
% of workforce · lower is better#68 of 340 cities · 5th of 14 in its peer group——————5.1%6.2%6.6%3.8%4.7%6.2%4.0%4.1%3.4%—6.7%5.6%3.2%3.7%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#244 of 314 cities with data · 12th of 13 in its peer group with data13%11%16%8%5%7%6%12%11%11%13%14%17%17%16%12%17%7%8%8%
dollars per resident · lower is better#229 of 314 cities with data · 8th of 13 in its peer group with data$598$512$4,240$3,968$4,235$4,124$3,985$4,402$4,300$3,692$3,600$4,321$4,223$4,034$4,101$4,914$4,844$4,542$4,404$4,126

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Norman. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.