How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Jurupa Valley, CA

108,154 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 0637692 · Census profile · mayors: being verified · the council picks the mayor (28 of 20 years on record)

Overall in 2023, Jurupa Valley ranked #60 of 340 cities and 1st of 14 in its peer group, on 5 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Jurupa Valley and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Lancaster CA, Victorville CA, Palmdale CA, Ontario CA, Grand Prairie TX, Glendale AZ, Tempe AZ, Mesquite TX, Killeen TX, West Valley City UT, Norman OK, Pasadena CA, Pasadena TX · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#60 of 340 cities · 1st of 14 in its peer group · 2023———————#53#106#144#133#223#108#205#140#50#173#72#60#103
people · size, not ranked—————95,59097,19598,35099,469100,080101,460103,240105,760108,314109,527105,356106,758107,190107,591108,154
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#61 of 340 cities · 1st of 14 in its peer group——————+0.7+0.5+0.4+0.5+0.5+0.7+0.8+0.8+0.5+0.1+1.1+0.5+0.3+0.3
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#172 of 303 cities with data · 8th of 13 in its peer group with data · 2022—————————2.5——5.83.3—5.43.03.1——
rent as % of income · lower is better#168 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group———————24.4%24.5%23.9%21.8%23.9%19.8%22.0%21.9%—20.3%20.9%23.7%24.3%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#114 of 304 cities with data · 5th of 12 in its peer group with data———————1.03.04.05.96.84.75.55.52.8—3.72.83.7
per 100,000 residents · lower is better————————————————————
jobs · size, not ranked24,53125,76724,89924,05521,28322,01923,28124,29425,21428,11430,91532,39233,45134,13835,67635,12134,97836,52037,408—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#72 of 329 cities with data · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023+1.9+0.4-3.1-2.2-5.7-0.9+4.5+5.5+0.4+7.0+5.7+0.1-0.1-1.3+3.1+0.9-3.6-3.2+1.5—
people · size, not ranked———————39,85441,66539,46042,98645,42046,94446,81746,185—47,92453,14749,11250,920
% of workforce · lower is better#170 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group———————18.6%14.7%11.1%11.6%8.7%7.0%9.6%8.5%—7.8%4.0%5.4%4.9%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#164 of 340 cities · 7th of 14 in its peer group · 2022———————66%44%———11%————22%——
dollars per resident · lower is better#6 of 340 cities · 1st of 14 in its peer group · 2022———————$0$0———$96————$120——

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Jurupa Valley. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.