How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Kansas City, KS

156,752 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 2036000 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Kansas City ranked #187 of 340 cities and 3rd of 14 in its peer group, on 8 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Kansas City and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Norman OK, Columbia SC, Akron OH, Charleston SC, Pasadena TX, Grand Rapids MI, South Bend IN, New Bedford MA, Waterbury CT, North Charleston SC, Worcester MA, Lancaster CA, Knoxville TN · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#187 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023#333#307#275#334#321#253#330#275#310#298#277#261#313#290#332#285#324#314#187#325
people · size, not ranked143,209142,519142,983143,677144,832145,878146,227147,454148,899150,122151,502152,485152,739152,965152,960156,302154,783153,327154,468156,752
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#221 of 340 cities · 11th of 14 in its peer group-1.7-1.8-1.1-0.9-0.5—-0.9-0.3-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.3-1.6-2.0-1.1-0.6
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#171 of 271 cities with data · 7th of 10 in its peer group with data——2.71.00.71.40.42.83.03.21.01.61.91.21.2—1.12.61.92.0
rent as % of income · lower is better#125 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group23.3%22.8%21.8%24.6%22.2%22.8%22.2%23.7%25.3%27.0%23.6%23.2%22.1%23.5%24.6%—21.7%21.7%22.1%23.1%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#247 of 304 cities with data · 11th of 13 in its peer group with data25.831.614.0—24.217.118.510.218.816.718.5———————3.212.1
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#276 of 295 cities with data · 13th of 13 in its peer group with data———————————————————267.9
jobs · size, not ranked63,47265,46669,31268,37965,85269,67769,53171,90170,66974,87279,60287,06084,85187,53486,23683,49880,15882,06385,615—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#79 of 329 cities with data · 3rd of 13 in its peer group with data · 2023-1.5+2.3+2.6-1.9+0.5+5.8-2.5+1.8-3.1+2.9+4.3+7.3-3.9+1.7-2.0+1.1-5.1-1.2+1.4—
people · size, not ranked——————60,95363,84464,21162,94470,73371,18170,24970,07670,264—70,19973,98571,00476,999
% of workforce · lower is better#280 of 340 cities · 10th of 14 in its peer group——————15.8%12.3%10.7%9.7%7.0%8.3%7.1%7.0%5.7%—6.7%4.8%4.7%6.5%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#298 of 314 cities with data · 13th of 14 in its peer group7%13%11%4%-5%6%3%13%21%14%27%17%14%16%15%11%-18%-15%-10%-15%
dollars per resident · lower is better#279 of 314 cities with data · 14th of 14 in its peer group$19,687$31,255$30,493$30,181$19,847$19,996$18,269$16,083$17,587$11,412$11,816$13,189$14,107$12,553$14,706$13,558$11,030$7,997$7,601$6,751

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Kansas City. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.