How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Garland, TX

250,431 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 4829000 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Garland ranked #252 of 340 cities and 11th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Garland and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Glendale AZ, Ontario CA, Grand Prairie TX, Irving TX, Fort Lauderdale FL, Tempe AZ, Riverside CA, Pomona CA, Arlington TX, Oxnard CA, Aurora CO, Jurupa Valley CA, Pasadena CA · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#252 of 340 cities · 11th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#211#209#171#157#205#202#180#117#229#185#207#139#154#239#238#245#245#254#252#230
people · size, not ranked217,004219,151220,441222,256225,022227,345230,055233,698234,660235,590237,161236,310238,327241,709239,928246,392244,391246,918246,283250,431
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#331 of 340 cities · 12th of 14 in its peer group-1.5-0.8-1.1-0.8-0.3—+0.0+0.5-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.9-0.9-0.2-1.6-0.7-1.4-1.8
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#166 of 271 cities with data · 8th of 12 in its peer group with data1.53.31.22.30.70.61.31.30.91.40.74.49.91.92.81.61.71.17.52.2
rent as % of income · lower is better#245 of 340 cities · 10th of 14 in its peer group20.4%20.4%20.7%20.0%21.3%20.2%22.6%21.6%23.1%21.6%22.0%21.3%20.9%23.0%23.0%—26.0%24.7%28.1%26.6%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#135 of 304 cities with data · 8th of 13 in its peer group with data3.21.43.24.53.13.12.23.02.62.13.43.03.43.74.61.68.22.04.94.8
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#121 of 295 cities with data · 3rd of 11 in its peer group with data———————————————49.553.254.343.939.9
jobs · size, not ranked60,08261,18863,72965,70663,59761,89563,57173,43274,46876,89776,54878,63179,37278,20777,62575,47876,75578,99679,897—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#305 of 329 cities with data · 12th of 14 in its peer group · 2023-0.1-2.2+1.2+0.5-1.1-3.2-0.9+12.8-1.7-0.0-3.6-0.8-1.8-3.4-3.0-0.9-0.6-4.4-3.0—
people · size, not ranked——————104,142113,298110,869109,469119,857117,138117,699121,323119,718—112,761123,804122,396124,610
% of workforce · lower is better#136 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group——————11.6%9.3%8.9%9.3%5.1%5.2%5.7%5.3%4.4%—5.2%4.3%3.9%4.5%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#148 of 314 cities with data · 5th of 12 in its peer group with data-2%0%11%17%13%16%10%10%7%7%13%12%17%21%22%18%15%18%17%25%
dollars per resident · lower is better#266 of 314 cities with data · 9th of 12 in its peer group with data$3,862$4,212$4,490$4,600$4,812$4,819$5,136$5,267$4,815$5,025$5,000$5,229$5,133$5,096$4,460$5,081$3,916$5,502$5,696$5,595

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Garland. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.