How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Tulsa, OK

415,154 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 4075000 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Tulsa ranked #192 of 340 cities and 11th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Tulsa and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Oklahoma City OK, Wichita KS, Omaha NE, Greensboro NC, Nashville TN, Tucson AZ, Lexington KY, Albuquerque NM, Kansas City MO, Fort Wayne IN, Corpus Christi TX, Memphis TN, Winston-Salem NC · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#192 of 340 cities · 11th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#254#227#238#216#193#258#191#173#168#183#205#241#280#228#201#272#192#221#192#211
people · size, not ranked381,967383,727385,779387,130390,339392,403393,005394,643398,401399,892403,491404,007402,060400,414401,190413,663412,923413,062414,035415,154
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#111 of 340 cities · 7th of 14 in its peer group-0.5+0.3+0.4+0.3+0.7—-0.1+0.2+0.6+0.3+0.5-0.1-0.7-0.4+0.0+0.1+0.1+0.1+0.2+0.0
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#188 of 271 cities with data · 10th of 10 in its peer group with data2.91.82.82.11.81.12.83.01.53.41.42.11.62.03.02.02.02.02.11.7
rent as % of income · lower is better#80 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group19.8%20.6%19.6%19.9%21.1%21.7%20.7%21.1%21.0%21.1%21.3%21.4%21.2%20.8%20.2%—20.7%21.6%22.3%21.6%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#216 of 304 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group15.213.814.312.917.413.812.510.615.111.513.617.817.415.013.717.414.514.38.59.2
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#273 of 295 cities with data · 9th of 13 in its peer group with data————————————————324.5254.2255.3263.5
jobs · size, not ranked257,953266,204270,730276,944266,716259,351259,754262,166265,433267,138271,182267,124264,846266,171270,660259,271253,163257,514267,540—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#184 of 329 cities with data · 9th of 14 in its peer group · 2023-0.8+0.6-1.2-0.6-0.5-0.9-1.9-1.6+0.5-1.3-0.3-0.8-0.5-0.6-0.3-1.0-0.5-0.8-0.3—
people · size, not ranked——————187,669186,876189,146194,167193,749190,335191,714192,283193,292—189,482200,747196,051201,415
% of workforce · lower is better#208 of 340 cities · 12th of 14 in its peer group——————8.0%7.9%7.2%5.6%6.4%7.0%6.9%5.0%5.5%—7.0%4.8%6.0%5.4%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#54 of 314 cities with data · 4th of 14 in its peer group28%33%30%32%34%31%30%34%33%26%35%37%34%37%37%37%40%37%37%36%
dollars per resident · lower is better#177 of 314 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group$6,079$5,733$5,539$5,340$5,223$4,494$4,467$4,342$3,796$3,769$4,438$4,272$4,492$4,228$4,275$4,436$3,984$3,388$3,007$2,979

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Tulsa. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.