How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Omaha, NE

489,265 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 3137000 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Omaha ranked #76 of 340 cities and 4th of 14 in its peer group, on 7 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Omaha and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Tulsa OK, Albuquerque NM, Wichita KS, Kansas City MO, Nashville TN, Lexington KY, Colorado Springs CO, Fort Wayne IN, Oklahoma City OK, Raleigh NC, Lincoln NE, Indianapolis IN, Denver CO · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#76 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#117#215#180#172#151#140#146#116#112#129#120#108#105#92#110#129#74#86#76#88
people · size, not ranked405,819406,125405,904406,320407,985459,659462,101465,261468,086470,423472,638475,044476,271477,299478,192492,783488,727486,666486,780489,265
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#154 of 340 cities · 8th of 14 in its peer group+0.0-0.1-0.3-0.1+0.2—+0.1+0.2+0.1-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.2+0.0-0.1-0.0-0.6-0.6-0.3-0.2
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#40 of 271 cities with data · 3rd of 10 in its peer group with data8.57.16.56.54.63.44.04.15.55.25.65.46.86.04.56.26.57.76.38.9
rent as % of income · lower is better#60 of 340 cities · 5th of 14 in its peer group18.5%18.9%18.1%18.2%18.4%20.3%19.4%20.2%19.4%20.3%19.0%19.6%19.0%18.3%18.4%—18.9%19.7%19.6%20.6%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#121 of 304 cities with data · 2nd of 14 in its peer group7.68.110.310.87.47.49.38.89.06.810.26.16.54.64.87.5—6.0—4.1
per 100,000 residents · lower is better————————————————————
jobs · size, not ranked293,016294,554301,625308,623299,198301,082304,582307,623310,906315,849322,710328,711329,994330,367330,858323,121320,809327,417336,681—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#208 of 329 cities with data · 11th of 13 in its peer group with data · 2023-0.5-1.4+0.2+0.1-0.5+0.0-0.3-0.4-0.1-0.4+0.3-0.4+0.1-0.7+0.0+0.1-1.3-0.3-0.7—
people · size, not ranked——————208,572209,301223,481228,720228,196227,368246,187243,707248,631—251,918255,906258,767252,854
% of workforce · lower is better#157 of 340 cities · 11th of 14 in its peer group——————9.2%7.6%5.1%6.0%4.1%4.8%4.3%4.5%4.8%—4.1%3.3%3.3%4.7%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report74%73%77%66%60%60%60%60%61%63%63%25%59%58%59%59%59%60%59%59%
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#169 of 314 cities with data · 11th of 14 in its peer group33%12%-4%9%12%16%17%31%30%25%26%28%27%26%25%24%27%25%21%22%
dollars per resident · lower is better#183 of 314 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group$3,079$2,922$3,067$3,394$3,644$3,404$3,003$3,083$3,739$3,506$3,852$3,855$3,712$3,529$3,387$3,486$3,259$3,146$2,785$3,026

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Omaha. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.