How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Gilbert, AZ

288,790 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 0427400 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Gilbert ranked #13 of 340 cities and 3rd of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Gilbert and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: McKinney TX, Murrieta CA, Temecula CA, Henderson NV, Peoria AZ, Allen TX, Chandler AZ, Corona CA, Roseville CA, Thornton CO, North Las Vegas NV, Cary NC, Santa Clarita CA · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#13 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023#4#6#48#8#10#10#41#7#8#4#3#6#8#4#11#9#16#19#13#24
people · size, not ranked167,443178,402187,674196,425203,693209,493211,466215,916221,626227,308232,401237,139242,695249,914254,114269,429274,421281,946286,632288,790
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#125 of 340 cities · 12th of 14 in its peer group+2.4+1.8+0.9+0.6+0.1—+0.3+0.9+0.8+0.8+0.9+1.1+0.9+1.1+1.3+0.4+1.0+0.7+0.1-0.0
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#62 of 271 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group25.819.517.96.16.15.17.311.49.86.58.410.77.07.26.79.87.05.15.66.4
rent as % of income · lower is better#66 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group16.7%17.4%18.3%18.4%19.8%17.9%20.8%18.9%18.3%18.3%18.4%18.1%19.6%18.4%18.7%—20.0%22.2%21.4%20.8%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#7 of 304 cities with data · 1st of 11 in its peer group with data—1.70.5—2.02.40.92.30.5—0.91.32.10.80.41.51.11.11.70.7
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#71 of 295 cities with data · 8th of 12 in its peer group with data————9.811.99.910.219.410.69.57.210.712.016.114.818.621.314.324.2
jobs · size, not ranked39,47044,90442,88244,56443,22744,11442,27252,18754,64359,52262,98266,69171,13074,70676,64476,66880,98387,80194,610—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#33 of 329 cities with data · 5th of 14 in its peer group · 2023+5.8+8.6-5.8+5.1+5.0+2.9-7.0+22.0+0.8+6.7+1.9+2.9+4.4+1.5-0.4+1.3+3.2+3.1+3.4—
people · size, not ranked——————99,945109,249111,712114,091124,033111,308124,556123,441128,319—139,837144,253148,438150,591
% of workforce · lower is better#78 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group——————6.5%5.9%5.2%5.6%3.9%6.3%3.0%3.6%3.4%—4.2%3.0%2.6%3.9%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#69 of 314 cities with data · 5th of 14 in its peer group56%50%53%43%34%38%29%40%39%42%43%43%32%32%27%25%15%35%34%34%
dollars per resident · lower is better#192 of 314 cities with data · 12th of 14 in its peer group$2,649$2,909$3,631$3,014$4,581$4,109$3,573$3,034$2,699$2,383$2,127$1,864$2,150$2,006$1,487$965$1,274$3,632$3,311$3,258

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Gilbert. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.