How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Roseville, CA

163,304 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 0662938 · Census profile · mayors: being verified · the council picks the mayor (0 of 20 years on record)

Overall in 2023, Roseville ranked #29 of 340 cities and 6th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Roseville and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: West Jordan UT, Thornton CO, Westminster CO, Vacaville CA, Antioch CA, Olathe KS, Peoria AZ, Arvada CO, Round Rock TX, Temecula CA, Richardson TX, Carrollton TX, Henderson NV · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#29 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#87#31#23#155#21#106#29#63#56#32#73#42#64#45#56#43#15#25#29#28
people · size, not ranked104,278107,910110,833114,241116,855119,916122,725124,432126,769128,397130,018132,708135,077138,953141,500148,520152,515156,070159,230163,304
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#10 of 340 cities · 2nd of 14 in its peer group+2.7+2.4+1.7+2.1+1.5—+1.4+0.8+1.1+0.7+0.7+1.4+1.4+1.8+1.4+0.3+1.7+1.1+1.1+1.7
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#23 of 271 cities with data · 2nd of 14 in its peer group9.57.210.48.65.25.33.35.34.26.37.46.912.45.88.611.012.311.512.311.7
rent as % of income · lower is better#94 of 340 cities · 7th of 14 in its peer group19.4%17.5%19.0%19.6%21.1%19.4%18.3%21.2%21.4%19.7%22.6%19.6%23.6%21.8%21.0%—20.2%24.9%24.0%22.1%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#33 of 304 cities with data · 3rd of 11 in its peer group with data—2.80.9—1.70.80.81.60.80.8———2.22.82.7—1.31.91.2
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#12 of 295 cities with data · 1st of 13 in its peer group with data——————————————————13.88.6
jobs · size, not ranked58,64364,08763,88559,24759,15259,23760,33363,98867,00468,83371,01876,79079,17181,23283,24281,71085,16491,72194,604—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#69 of 329 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group · 2023+1.1+7.7+1.0-8.2+4.7-11.5+0.7+6.1+2.2+0.0+2.2+4.3+0.8+0.6-0.9-0.1+3.4+2.0+1.6—
people · size, not ranked——————54,19557,47960,51560,52460,87760,84465,45367,67871,050—75,78475,10975,76381,525
% of workforce · lower is better#171 of 340 cities · 9th of 14 in its peer group——————7.7%9.4%7.2%6.4%5.6%5.5%4.6%4.1%3.4%—4.2%4.0%4.9%4.9%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#40 of 314 cities with data · 3rd of 13 in its peer group with data21%37%50%28%27%17%17%15%9%35%29%30%39%39%51%47%60%41%40%38%
dollars per resident · lower is better#267 of 314 cities with data · 13th of 13 in its peer group with data$10,782$12,010$13,279$12,646$14,645$13,749$12,913$11,738$11,099$10,378$9,796$9,387$9,445$11,495$11,325$8,846$7,505$6,079$5,874$5,612

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Roseville. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.