How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Pearland, TX

129,620 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 4856348 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Pearland ranked #34 of 340 cities and 4th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Pearland and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Georgetown TX, Concord NC, Murfreesboro TN, Edinburg TX, Carmel IN, New Braunfels TX, Conroe TX, Victorville CA, Fishers IN, Killeen TX, Pompano Beach FL, Lewisville TX, Hesperia CA · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#34 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#15#18#15#11#4#21#20#27#16#14#10#14#13#13#18#119#11#31#34#51
people · size, not ranked68,33673,57678,69183,42088,22194,06396,27199,283102,832106,027111,267115,926119,312121,424122,460126,011126,071127,402128,536129,620
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#9 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group+1.2+2.4+1.9+1.5+1.5—+0.5+0.7+0.9+1.3+1.3+1.4+1.6+1.2+0.8+0.3+1.0+1.7+2.1+1.8
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#249 of 271 cities with data · 12th of 12 in its peer group with data42.532.027.415.216.99.011.113.39.319.6—10.47.96.75.34.25.72.71.70.5
rent as % of income · lower is better#8 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group—15.8%13.4%14.7%15.1%15.8%14.0%15.4%12.5%14.6%16.6%16.3%15.3%17.3%16.6%—16.9%18.2%20.0%16.8%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#71 of 304 cities with data · 4th of 10 in its peer group with data1.5—2.51.21.13.22.11.01.01.91.80.91.71.62.42.40.80.81.62.3
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#76 of 295 cities with data · 3rd of 11 in its peer group with data7.319.015.218.013.618.119.711.115.622.617.122.427.720.612.221.430.929.028.824.7
jobs · size, not ranked16,09617,13818,42319,82521,12422,37223,70923,79526,23227,78730,22530,49232,20334,74136,27334,71635,15737,34540,159—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#40 of 329 cities with data · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023+1.8+2.1+3.6+3.6+8.3+4.3+1.8-1.3+6.5+2.0+5.4+0.9+5.5+5.9+1.7-1.8+2.8-0.1+2.9—
people · size, not ranked——————47,92449,48755,38552,18159,99858,75865,18861,99268,150—60,62166,33365,43970,027
% of workforce · lower is better#69 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group——————3.5%7.0%5.0%3.1%3.5%5.0%3.2%2.9%2.1%—3.1%2.1%3.1%3.8%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#120 of 314 cities with data · 3rd of 12 in its peer group with data27%31%27%17%22%17%24%22%23%27%27%30%32%29%32%31%51%31%28%28%
dollars per resident · lower is better#196 of 314 cities with data · 7th of 12 in its peer group with data$3,947$4,388$5,218$6,580$7,175$6,936$7,128$6,847$6,474$4,698$3,776$3,096$6,319$6,408$6,401$6,198$7,378$6,370$3,849$3,334

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Pearland. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.