How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Midland, TX

143,687 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 4848072 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Midland ranked #67 of 340 cities and 3rd of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Midland and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Wichita Falls TX, Odessa TX, Lafayette LA, Macon-Bibb County GA, Topeka KS, Evansville IN, Abilene TX, Greeley CO, Clarksville TN, St. George UT, Amarillo TX, Huntsville AL, Fort Collins CO · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#67 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group · 2023#109#113#65#64#24#13#56#25#27#47#37#37#38#22#30#49#63#116#67#44
people · size, not ranked100,205102,761105,138107,869110,748111,276113,941119,794124,163128,352133,440134,935136,205142,173146,038133,245131,918135,099139,488143,687
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#31 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group+0.2+1.4+1.0+1.3+1.3—+1.4+3.6+2.0+1.3+1.9-0.5-0.5+2.9+1.2-0.1-2.1+0.9+1.4+0.9
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#31 of 271 cities with data · 3rd of 12 in its peer group with data3.94.64.94.53.03.54.78.414.712.17.75.05.68.68.89.76.54.45.810.5
rent as % of income · lower is better#145 of 340 cities · 10th of 14 in its peer group17.4%16.7%16.2%16.0%19.1%19.5%21.5%18.5%18.8%18.4%17.8%20.8%17.4%18.4%20.2%—16.3%19.0%16.6%23.7%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#154 of 304 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group1.04.93.83.72.71.83.53.34.05.55.22.21.53.5—7.59.19.65.05.6
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#177 of 295 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group————————————————66.798.496.882.8
jobs · size, not ranked48,79852,15354,41356,58956,35357,80858,42264,60768,51970,39870,55668,66770,81175,94875,90873,60169,73774,09180,087—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#274 of 329 cities with data · 11th of 14 in its peer group · 2023-2.0-0.6-0.6-2.3+0.9+1.9-2.1-3.7-0.7-2.3+0.2+3.3-4.4-4.4-5.4+1.7+3.2-4.7-1.9—
people · size, not ranked——————55,46460,15963,29067,71268,65666,90966,53677,72875,826—68,81265,70067,99868,642
% of workforce · lower is better#13 of 340 cities · 1st of 14 in its peer group——————4.2%3.8%3.1%4.2%4.7%5.5%2.9%1.7%1.7%—5.2%3.4%2.8%2.6%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#37 of 314 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group13%15%17%28%25%18%14%26%29%33%33%34%33%32%30%41%38%21%33%39%
dollars per resident · lower is better#228 of 314 cities with data · 11th of 14 in its peer group$1,667$1,577$1,360$1,949$1,806$1,793$1,593$1,429$1,513$1,282$1,080$907$736$554$1,178$1,647$1,497$2,028$3,652$4,036

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Midland. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.