How serious are America’s mayors? · New Jersey township

Edison, NJ

110,002 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 3402320230 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Edison ranked #88 of 340 cities and 6th of 14 in its peer group, on 6 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Edison and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Woodbridge NJ, Stamford CT, Cary NC, Sandy Springs GA, Centennial CO, Richardson TX, San Mateo CA, Lee's Summit MO, Simi Valley CA, Carlsbad CA, Quincy MA, Alexandria VA, Orange CA · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#88 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#165#70#191#134#159#154#162#194#143#210#178#129#85#50#69#102#87#271#88#69
people · size, not ranked99,60399,01999,16499,53299,772100,302100,577100,900100,921101,054100,948100,631100,605100,28799,758107,061107,587107,636108,399110,002
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#257 of 340 cities · 7th of 14 in its peer group-0.8-1.6-0.9-0.6-0.6—-0.6-0.5-0.7-0.7-1.1-1.2-1.0-0.9-0.9-0.1-0.4-1.0-0.8-0.7
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#252 of 303 cities with data · 7th of 14 in its peer group · 20221.43.40.90.50.30.50.30.20.40.50.6———2.31.03.31.1——
rent as % of income · lower is better#42 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group18.1%18.4%19.3%18.3%16.6%18.3%18.4%18.5%17.8%18.1%17.3%19.1%18.3%18.1%16.6%—17.7%17.6%17.8%20.0%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#19 of 304 cities with data · 3rd of 10 in its peer group with data—1.0—1.01.02.02.0—2.0————2.01.00.9———0.9
per 100,000 residents · lower is better————————————————————
jobs · size, not ranked76,44977,95479,40277,98174,78973,37571,71371,93672,75672,90474,84777,29080,96582,70483,71879,86585,15285,14884,551—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#302 of 329 cities with data · 12th of 14 in its peer group · 2023+0.2+1.0-0.0-1.8-5.0-3.9-3.5-0.5-0.5-2.0+0.8+0.7+3.5+0.5+0.0+4.8+5.4-7.1-3.0—
people · size, not ranked——————48,19253,81450,72350,50652,54747,15250,98249,12048,786—55,24655,96155,87458,544
% of workforce · lower is better#225 of 340 cities · 12th of 14 in its peer group——————9.3%7.5%6.9%5.8%5.0%7.4%5.9%4.0%2.9%—7.0%5.9%3.5%5.6%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#312 of 314 cities with data · 11th of 12 in its peer group with data7%8%10%8%6%4%8%6%2%-1%-28%-18%-21%-25%-26%-23%-15%-40%-36%-41%
dollars per resident · lower is better#43 of 314 cities with data · 5th of 12 in its peer group with data$1,045$908$1,344$1,174$1,056$1,030$926$817$748$892$822$743$657$575$478$301$223$341$157$819

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Edison. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.