How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Cambridge, MA

121,186 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 2511000 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Cambridge ranked #182 of 340 cities and 5th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Cambridge and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Yonkers NY, Alexandria VA, Jersey City NJ, Elizabeth NJ, Norwalk CA, Lowell MA, Berkeley CA, Daly City CA, Garden Grove CA, Quincy MA, Costa Mesa CA, Brockton MA, Bridgeport CT · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#182 of 340 cities · 5th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#198#251#199#223#230#250#192#85#182#98#132#211#157#148#101#57#131#137#182#85
people · size, not ranked101,440101,876102,313103,298104,665105,008105,884107,886112,036112,993113,471115,685116,869118,151118,927118,204117,215117,973119,315121,186
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#226 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group-1.2-0.9-0.5+0.1+0.3—+0.0+0.0-0.0-0.3-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.7-0.7-0.3-1.0-1.1-0.8-0.6
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#111 of 271 cities with data · 1st of 9 in its peer group with data9.80.56.00.30.10.40.33.6—2.5————————1.04.0
rent as % of income · lower is better#118 of 340 cities · 2nd of 14 in its peer group25.4%29.7%27.2%24.8%25.1%27.2%28.0%24.8%26.2%24.0%25.0%27.3%25.9%26.5%23.6%—26.5%26.5%26.2%23.0%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#12 of 309 cities with data · 1st of 12 in its peer group with data · 20233.02.0—1.91.9—4.70.92.71.82.61.71.7—0.80.80.9—0.8—
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#52 of 295 cities with data · 4th of 13 in its peer group with data——18.610.619.113.316.17.48.03.511.512.19.411.815.114.423.921.215.919.0
jobs · size, not ranked——————106,789110,227112,537116,068121,884126,439129,225133,381143,662139,383143,420159,166158,496—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#298 of 329 cities with data · 12th of 14 in its peer group · 2023———————+1.6-0.1+1.0+2.7+1.2+0.9+1.8+6.5+4.2+1.4+5.7-2.8—
people · size, not ranked——————61,13061,69661,11863,95769,23763,90165,87370,98872,255—70,98371,34671,11475,799
% of workforce · lower is better#41 of 340 cities · 2nd of 14 in its peer group——————5.5%4.8%7.0%3.9%3.3%6.0%4.1%3.7%3.3%—3.7%2.6%3.3%3.4%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#242 of 314 cities with data · 3rd of 10 in its peer group with data11%10%6%6%2%3%8%5%10%14%13%12%17%18%18%17%17%18%13%9%
dollars per resident · lower is better#256 of 314 cities with data · 6th of 10 in its peer group with data$4,381$4,318$4,142$4,469$4,573$4,349$4,252$4,310$4,412$4,225$4,733$4,634$4,622$4,839$5,059$4,920$4,873$4,656$4,573$5,139

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Cambridge. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.