How serious are America’s mayors? · Incorporated city

Overland Park, KS

202,893 people, 2024 · Census GEOID 2053775 · Census profile · mayors: being verified

Overall in 2023, Overland Park ranked #18 of 340 cities and 4th of 14 in its peer group, on 9 of 9 measures. Weigh the measures yourself · how ranks are made

Its peer group is Overland Park and the 13 cities most like it in 2005 (size, income, poverty, industry, growth, density, place), fixed since: Olathe KS, Chesapeake VA, Westminster CO, Scottsdale AZ, Arvada CO, Rancho Cucamonga CA, Plano TX, Richardson TX, Santa Clarita CA, Centennial CO, Lee's Summit MO, Oceanside CA, Joliet IL · on the map, and why

Topline2005–2024Latest rank0506070809101112131415161718192021222324
Overall rankamong all cities with a score that year#18 of 340 cities · 4th of 14 in its peer group · 2023#52#86#22#53#38#225#13#45#23#86#46#51#50#10#15#114#26#20#18#14
people · size, not ranked163,979166,602168,801170,752172,363174,040176,034178,683180,932183,980186,222189,302191,327192,724195,494197,852199,088200,353201,223202,893
net movers per 100 residents · estimate · higher is better#148 of 340 cities · 6th of 14 in its peer group+0.8+1.1+0.8+0.6+0.4—+0.4+0.3+0.4+0.3+0.2+0.1+0.3+0.4+0.1+0.1+0.1+0.2-0.1-0.2
new homes per 1,000 residents · higher is better#141 of 271 cities with data · 6th of 14 in its peer group5.86.63.52.75.51.34.23.38.75.18.06.54.310.96.12.43.52.44.12.9
rent as % of income · lower is better#28 of 340 cities · 5th of 14 in its peer group14.8%14.8%14.8%15.3%15.3%14.9%16.3%16.2%16.8%16.9%15.1%17.3%16.7%16.4%15.7%—16.8%17.0%18.2%18.8%
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#23 of 309 cities with data · 5th of 12 in its peer group with data · 20231.2—1.20.61.7—1.11.11.13.32.72.12.11.62.02.01.02.51.0—
per 100,000 residents · lower is better#99 of 295 cities with data · 7th of 12 in its peer group with data———————————————38.933.735.441.730.1
jobs · size, not ranked124,587119,996134,932135,369131,110120,265128,594129,870132,751130,089133,993134,855134,403136,056137,098130,109131,110137,304140,445—
points ahead of the metro · higher is better#209 of 329 cities with data · 11th of 14 in its peer group · 2023-3.0-4.5+9.2-0.3+1.0-8.3+4.6-0.6+0.9-5.1+1.0-1.4-1.7-0.2+0.2-0.8-0.4+1.2-0.7—
people · size, not ranked——————94,65095,60197,85297,535101,229103,655106,585106,469111,760—109,873113,864108,742112,032
% of workforce · lower is better#16 of 340 cities · 3rd of 14 in its peer group——————5.7%4.4%4.2%4.3%3.6%3.5%2.9%2.7%2.2%—3.5%3.1%2.9%2.8%
% of promises funded · not ranked: 38 cities report————————————————————
surplus as % of revenue · higher is better#18 of 314 cities with data · 5th of 14 in its peer group47%42%42%23%22%33%31%25%33%36%37%37%43%47%43%46%38%47%44%45%
dollars per resident · lower is better#22 of 314 cities with data · 3rd of 14 in its peer group$1,289$1,124$11,533$11,435$12,091$12,261$11,556$10,922$10,716$10,529$10,619$9,715$3,890$2,946$2,907$2,321$2,047$533$1,110$457

Click a row for its source and its rank in every year. 1st is best whichever way the measure points. A rank is out of all 340 cities, or out of its peer group of 14; where some had no value that year it says “with data” and counts only those. An em dash is a year the source does not hold for Overland Park. A greyed homicide figure is a year the FBI holds as a transition year for this department. What each row is, and is not, is on the main page, with a link to every source in Sources.